The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the listing of misleading methods is using a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This enables mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking concerning the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The actual fact is, the PCR take a look at is just not designed to be used as a diagnostic instrument because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones.1
It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses usually are not interchangeable by way of infectivity. When you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can not unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome individuals testing “constructive.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Check Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re decoding outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Because of its tiny measurement, it have to be amplified to turn out to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab known as a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the larger the chance that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no menace to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Medical Infectious Ailments revealed that once you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or increased, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive fee.
But, a take a look at referred to as the Corman-Drosten paper and assessments advisable by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention suggest working PCR assessments at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive assessments, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many are actually questioning whether or not this was achieved on objective to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is referred to as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s property.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as general mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and consistent with earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness is just not killing an extra variety of individuals. The identical variety of individuals would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC knowledge15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only trigger on the dying certificates.
“For deaths with circumstances or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further circumstances or causes per dying,” the CDC said, and any a kind of comorbidities might have killed these individuals even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of knowledge at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in gentle of all these knowledge tells us they don’t seem to be serious about getting an correct image of the an infection fee.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy fee is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a constructive PCR take a look at being a true constructive shrinks to zero.
Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic assessment17 revealed within the journal of Medical Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which had been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing stay virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the prospect of a constructive take a look at truly being as a result of presence of stay (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the percentages of stay virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to establish any stay viruses in instances the place a constructive PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, with the intention to produce stay virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, if in case you have signs of COVID-19 and take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or increased, then you might be prone to be contaminated and infectious.
Nonetheless, if you happen to should not have signs, but take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or increased, then it’s probably a false constructive and also you pose no danger to others as you are unlikely to hold any stay virus. The truth is, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you happen to take a look at constructive with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or increased.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Check
The video above consists of a number of interviews with consultants who’ve brazenly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections equivalent to COVID-19. These embrace:
The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken concerning the take a look at for different infections, equivalent to HIV, however died in August 2019, a number of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Heart for Proof-Based mostly Drugs
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a advisor pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular drugs and a world-renowned skilled on the PCR take a look at
In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that each one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you may detect, nevertheless it can not inform you whether or not these particles truly pose a danger to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you may primarily discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all types, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply lifeless particles that pose no danger.
Bustin factors out that once you get a constructive consequence utilizing a CT of 35 or increased, you are trying on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The probability of that inflicting a well being drawback is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it roughly ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting lifeless nucelotides. No stay virus could be detected at CTs that top.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based mostly
November 30, 2020, a crew of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a assessment18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual the world over.
In response to Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key wrongdoer within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted attributable to “deadly errors,”24 one in every of which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was obtainable. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer assessment. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who are actually demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.
When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like supplying you with a number of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It might be any fish … Hear, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you place it in … That is mainly a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the middle of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there are not any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they mentioned: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one individual. One individual, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One individual. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the assessment reads, partially:26
“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to vastly reduce human price and struggling going ahead. Is it not in one of the best curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is obvious. Within the face of all of the great PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There may be not a lot of a selection left within the framework of scientific integrity and duty.”
The critique towards PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive instances at all. The examine evaluated knowledge from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Might 14 and June 1, 2020.
A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 individuals with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, after they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no stay virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Exams Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody assessments are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. When you have antibodies towards SARS-CoV-2, that will be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future previously. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at may prove constructive if in case you have antibodies towards widespread chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses liable for the widespread chilly may end up in a constructive COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even if you happen to’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the widespread chilly additionally seem to offer some normal and long-lasting resistance towards SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 revealed Might 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from delicate instances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In response to the authors, this means there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘widespread chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, if you happen to’ve recovered from a standard chilly attributable to a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate once you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you proof against COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in essentially the most extreme instances — about 1 in 5. So, a damaging antibody take a look at does not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, situation of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based drugs for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a number of the obtainable knowledge, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they aren’t.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which probably replicate present circumstances in the USA and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”
Ebell and Barry identified that most of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they advisable that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a method that displays the native inhabitants prevalence primarily based on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive fee,” as this data “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making relating to earlier an infection and return to work or faculty.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that knowledge of their reporting, and the method issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that take a look at constructive for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out realizing it, and which 90% are in a position to eradicate with out therapy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital sources wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting individuals to die attributable to lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even decreasing the variety of individuals that will finally get contaminated. They definitely had been by no means meant to stop all dying. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not doable, beneath any circumstance.
Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — one of the best form — would stop it from reemerging. But the objective posts hold shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns changed into months in some areas. Ultimately, we had been advised every thing would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine turned obtainable. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been advised we might nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns effectively into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is happening?
The one rational purpose for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering primarily based on a mix of wildly manipulated knowledge and flawed assessments.
Apart from PCR testing knowledge, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there may be such a factor as COVID-19, and folks have and do die from it, there are not any extra deaths attributable to it.36,37,38 The whole mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, until we suppose we should always shut down the world and cease residing as a result of individuals die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is no purpose to close down the world as a result of some individuals occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Subsequently, “any enforced quarantine primarily based on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome individuals to self-isolate might be a violation of their elementary proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized instances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which can assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, think about:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to impartial consultants — do the analysis. Learn via the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the details on PCR testing, so you may clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- In case you are a medical skilled, particularly if you happen to’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from impartial consultants.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a bunch so that you just can have assist — Examples of teams shaped to struggle towards authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a bunch campaigning for reopening colleges and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Ok., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. crew of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise house owners and oldsters who’re combating to guard freedom and liberty.